Mercedes ML 2008 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.0 - 6.2 | 3.0 - 6.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 - 510 HP | 241 - 468 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 - 700 NM | 347 - 630 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 - 9.8 seconds | 4.8 - 9.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 - 16.5 | 8.3 - 14.1 | |
|
Mercedes ML petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jeep Grand Cherokee. On average, Mercedes ML equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Mercedes ML is smaller, but higher. Mercedes ML is 4 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes ML is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 551 litres | 994 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1554 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Mercedes ML has 443 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes ML is 0.4 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Mercedes ML can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`854 | ~ 2`949 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes ML has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |