Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Jeep Compass 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mazda CX-30) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Jeep Compass) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Jeep Compass is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-30 engine produces 48 HP less power than Jeep Compass, whereas torque is 167 NM less than Jeep Compass. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.7 | |
| Mazda CX-30 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-30 could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Compass gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Compass can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.64 m | |
| Mazda CX-30 and Jeep Compass are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 458 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | no data | |
|
Jeep Compass has more luggage space. Mazda CX-30 has 28 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`021 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 400 | 25 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |