Land Rover Range Rover 1994 vs Volkswagen Touareg 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 - 4.6 | 2.5 - 6.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 226 HP | 175 - 450 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 - 400 NM | 305 - 750 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 17.5 seconds | 5.9 - 12.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 - 16.5 | 9.6 - 15.9 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Touareg. On average, Land Rover Range Rover equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touareg. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is smaller, but higher. Land Rover Range Rover is 4 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Touareg, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1570 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Touareg. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`500 | ~ 2`958 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volkswagen Touareg has
| |