Ford S-Max 2010 vs Ford S-Max 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.2 | 1.8 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 240 HP | 100 - 220 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 - 420 NM | 190 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 13 seconds | 7.9 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.3 | 6.2 - 9.7 | |
|
Ford S-Max 2010 petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford S-Max 2006. On average, Ford S-Max 2010 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max 2006. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.66 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford S-Max 2010 and Ford S-Max 2006 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 285 litres | 854 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2000 litres | 2100 litres | |
|
Ford S-Max 2006 has more luggage space. Ford S-Max 2010 has 569 litres less trunk space than the Ford S-Max 2006. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford S-Max 2006 (by 100 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`457 | ~ 2`433 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 3800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford S-Max has
|
Ford S-Max has
| |