Fiat Punto 2003 vs Nissan Micra 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.2 - 1.9 | 1.2 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 60 - 100 HP | 65 - 88 HP | |
Torque: | 102 - 260 NM | 110 - 185 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 14.3 seconds | 11.9 - 17.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 6.5 | 4.5 - 6.8 | |
Fiat Punto petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan Micra. On average, Fiat Punto equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.86 m | 3.72 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.66 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.54 m | |
Fiat Punto is 14 cm longer than the Nissan Micra, width is practically the same , while the height of Fiat Punto is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 297 litres | 371 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1080 litres | 584 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Fiat Punto has 74 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Micra. This could mean that the Fiat Punto uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Fiat Punto (by 496 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Fiat Punto is 0.7 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra, which means Fiat Punto can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`500 | ~ 1`485 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | average | |
Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Punto has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |