Dodge Charger 2005 vs Jaguar XKR 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dodge Charger is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jaguar XKR can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.7 - 6.1 | 4.2 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 193 - 432 HP | 395 HP | |
Torque: | 258 - 569 NM | 540 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 - 6 seconds | 5.4 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 - 14.7 | 12.4 | |
Dodge Charger petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jaguar XKR. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.08 m | 4.78 m | |
Width: | 1.89 m | 2.02 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.30 m | |
Dodge Charger is 31 cm longer than the Jaguar XKR, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Charger is 18 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 327 litres | |
Dodge Charger has more luggage capacity. Dodge Charger has 133 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar XKR. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`185 | ~ 2`105 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 6800 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
| |