Dodge Charger 2005 vs Jaguar XKR 2004

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Dodge Charger
2005 - 2010
Jaguar XKR
2004 - 2006
Gearbox: Automatic Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Dodge Charger is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jaguar XKR can be equipped only with rear wheel drive.
Engines: 2.7 - 6.14.2

Performance

Power: 193 - 432 HP395 HP
Torque: 258 - 569 NM540 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 4.9 - 6 seconds5.4 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.8 - 14.712.4
Dodge Charger petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jaguar XKR.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 5.08 m4.78 m
Width: 1.89 m2.02 m
Height: 1.48 m1.30 m
Dodge Charger is 31 cm longer than the Jaguar XKR, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Charger is 18 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 460 litres327 litres
Dodge Charger has more luggage capacity.
Dodge Charger has 133 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar XKR.
Turning diameter: 11.9 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`185~ 2`105
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 6800no data
Pros and Cons: Dodge Charger has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv