Dacia Logan 2016 vs Citroen C4 2015
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Dacia Logan engine produces 25 HP less power than Citroen C4, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Citroen C4. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 | 3.8 | |
| Dacia Logan consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4, which means that by driving the Dacia Logan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1350 km in combined cycle | 1570 km in combined cycle | |
| 1350 km on highway | 1710 km on highway | ||
| Citroen C4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C5, Peugeot 207 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Logan might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Citroen C4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Dacia Logan 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Dacia Logan 2016 1.5 engine Citroen C4 2015 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Citroen C4 2015 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.49 m | |
| Dacia Logan is 2 cm longer than the Citroen C4, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Logan is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 408 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1257 litres | 1183 litres | |
|
Dacia Logan has more luggage capacity. Dacia Logan has 102 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dacia Logan (by 74 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Logan is 0.1 metres more than that of the Citroen C4. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`625 kg | 1`825 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Citroen C4 scores higher in safety tests. The Citroen C4 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Citroen C4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Logan has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Citroen C4, so Citroen C4 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Citroen C4 has
| |