Citroen C4 2004 vs Kia Ceed 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 138 HP | 90 - 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 133 - 320 NM | 137 - 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 - 14.6 seconds | 10.3 - 13.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 8.1 | 4.7 - 7.7 | |
|
Citroen C4 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Ceed. On average, a Citroen C4 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Kia Ceed. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen C4 is 3 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C4 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1023 litres | 1300 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Citroen C4 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Kia Ceed. This could mean that the Citroen C4 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Ceed (by 277 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`755 | ~ 1`778 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |