Citroen C4 Picasso 2007 vs Mazda 5 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 138 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda 5 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 5 HP less power than Mazda 5, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Mazda 5. Due to the lower power, Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C4 Picasso could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso is 9 cm shorter than the Mazda 5, 7 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 112 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 112 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 500 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1566 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mazda 5, which means Citroen C4 Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 2`230 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 5, so Citroen C4 Picasso quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda 5 has
| |