BMW X3 2014 vs Honda CR-V 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| BMW X3 is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda CR-V can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, BMW X3 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 1.6 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 313 HP | 120 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 - 630 NM | 190 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 - 9.8 seconds | 9.7 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 8.3 | 4.5 - 8.4 | |
|
BMW X3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, BMW X3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
|
BMW X3 is larger, but slightly lower. BMW X3 is 10 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 6 cm wider, while the height of BMW X3 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1600 litres | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, BMW X3 has 39 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the BMW X3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 69 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X3 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`350 | ~ 2`133 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 20 800 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X3 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |