BMW 3 series 1991 vs Volvo S60 2000

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW 3 series
1991 - 1998
Volvo S60
2000 - 2004
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
BMW 3 series is available only with rear wheel drive, while Volvo S60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.6 - 2.82.0 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 90 - 193 HP130 - 300 HP
Torque: 141 - 280 NM192 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.3 - 15 seconds5.7 - 12 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.5 - 10.06.5 - 13.0
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S60. On average, BMW 3 series equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.43 m4.58 m
Width: 1.70 m1.80 m
Height: 1.39 m1.43 m
BMW 3 series is smaller.
BMW 3 series is 15 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 10 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 435 litres424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1200 litres1034 litres
Even though the car is shorter, BMW 3 series has 11 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. The Volvo S60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW 3 series (by 166 litres).
Turning diameter: 10 meters13 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 3 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`755~ 2`030
Safety:
Quality:
low

above average
Average price (€): 24001400
Rating in user reviews: 7.2/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • better manoeuvrability
Volvo S60 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv