Audi A5 2009 vs Renault Laguna 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Renault Laguna is a more dynamic driving. Audi A5 engine produces 10 HP less power than Renault Laguna, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Renault Laguna. Due to the lower power, Audi A5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Audi A5 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna, which means that by driving the Audi A5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi A5 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1230 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 970 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Audi A4, Seat Altea, Audi Q5, Seat Leon, Seat Exeo | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Laguna might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2010 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Audi A5 is larger, but lower. Audi A5 is 2 cm longer than the Renault Laguna, 4 cm wider, while the height of Audi A5 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
980 litres | no data | |
|
Audi A5 has more luggage capacity. Audi A5 has 30 litres more trunk space than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi A5 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Renault Laguna, which means Audi A5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`060 | 2`045 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Audi A5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Laguna has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Audi A5, so Audi A5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A5 has
|
Renault Laguna has
| |